Name: 【How to】 Beat A Child Support Case
Uploaded: 2020-10-18T21:30:12Z
Description: How I Beat Child Support Part 1 of 2 (Free Training)

beat

How I Beat Child Support Part 1 of 2 (Free Training)

Audio volume control bar 0:00 / 0:00 Quality:

Sharing buttons:

greetings how are you guys today

um as you know just launched

self governance u.com

and uh today there's a subject

that um of course i'm very passionate

about

and it's what actually got me to see the

truth and start to ascend to the mind

and

open up uh my vision

and step outside of the box the mental

indoctrination that i was

subjected to as a youngster through my

family my friends

the school system uh through you know

the corporation identified as title 28

3002 15a

all right and so we're gonna get started

on this it's 27 pages long

bear with me this is literally

my fight through child support now i

want to make it very

very very clear my stance okay because

it's important

i don't believe that you shouldn't take

care of your offspring

you made them take care of them all

right

but i also don't agree that a government

that has taken everything of intrinsic

value and substance

out of the economy who can't balance

their own affairs

checkbooks ledgers so on have

a right to tell me how to do it

all right so i i love my offspring

want to do the best for them my intent

and purpose as a man

is to do what's right for my loved ones

my friends my family my community

it's only right so there's the intent

okay

now we're getting ready to get into this

document

and this is what i sent to every public

official i could think of

during an alleged child support

issue okay which should rightfully be

offset

discharged and taken care of or just

discharged

but at the same token i'm not going to

abandon the credit that's there

because they accessed that credit

out of the says to kv trust

that was created a constructive trust

and

i hold the bailment certificate

which is otherwise identified as the

birth certificate and after the age of

i'm the only one that can pick that up

and because of that i'm the holder in

due course

and authenticating that document means

that you're adopting that abandoned

document through

commercial ucc all right

so when we when we're looking at at that

aspect of it when we understand what

those

documents are their value

debt is value okay

and there's some fundamentals that you

have to understand but anyway i want to

get back to the subject matter the

subject matter

at this very moment in time is about

child support and i'm going to

show you how they work together

to fleece the american people and create

war

amongst the families i love my ex-wife

love her to pieces do anything for that

woman right

we were married before the eyes of god

at one point

and unfortunately married before the

eyes of the state

which it had us engaged in polygamy

which is against both of our views

spiritually

all right we didn't know that we didn't

comprehend what the commercial

realm is at that time so we weren't duly

informed

but all men are responsible for knowing

the law because all men are responsible

for knowing the contracts they enter

into ladies and gentlemen

okay so ignorance of the law excuses no

man i entered into a contract as a young

man

not realizing the significance of said

contract

okay well everybody says well you

weren't duly informed sure

here's the here's the fatal flaw to that

i never asked any questions

am i do any answers if i never ask a

question

the answer is no okay so i'm supposed to

read so i can ask those questions and

then decide if i want to enter into that

contract or redline veto

aspects of that contract and say i'll

sign this but i won't sign that

i'll agree to this but i'm not waving

all my rights i'll agree to

a fair meaningful hearing you bet but

i'm not going to waive any of my rights

my red line veto that i'll initial that

if this court wants to proceed

we can move forward you bet i'm gonna

dictate how it's gonna roll

period all right but when you can't get

it through the damn heads

when they're just so thick in the skull

about unjustly enriching themselves

this is the process i went through which

was about 18 months of studying

and aman osiris was a huge help in this

i watched a lot of his audios and videos

and you will find a lot of the intel

within this

except for my personal experiences that

are written within this 27-page document

that went to the secret service the dod

the doj the doj criminal division

i went to the senators the congressmen

the governor the attorney general

went to the secretary of state for the

united states

i believe i even sent a copy to the

white house for the president the

setting president at the time

um and i got all these green cards back

and it's important to realize what i'm

doing in this document

what i'm doing is waving their immunity

i'm getting the the presumed and assumed

immunity right out of the way by

exposing their criminal activity

that they're all complicit with and

they're all in bed together

fleecing the american people creating

war why war

because war creates controversy and

controversy is

profitable ladies and gentlemen that's

what's happening stateside furthermore

that's what's happening around the world

controversy always is profitable in a

false and fictitious monetary system

okay so here we go to whom it may

concern it has come to my attention

the egregious deception perpetrated

against the american people by the state

government federal government and bar

association

whereas the legislature have implemented

provisions

for which are voluntary otherwise

legally speaking

would be unconstitutional the problem i

have found

is that due process is clearly being

violated rendering

all proceedings not only voidable

but void from inception now i'm going to

talk about equity here

notice to agent is notice to principal

anybody see anything wrong

right here right here i spelled

principle

incorrectly and this is what i love

about equity

equity disregards the form and

looks at the intent noticed agent is

noticed a principle

irrelevant that i suppose spelled

principle incorrectly

it's the intent in equity we love equity

equity is a time

traveler equity can literally it's a

time

vessel machine you can be present you

can be passed you can be

future in equity okay equity is gorgeous

it's open-eyed equity it's true

justice a marriage license

issued by the state is a legal

proceeding

and by due process requires nothing to

be concealed

to all parties involved of any legal

consequences

right here according to due process

law if there's any concealment in the

said

parties involved of any legal

consequence

it's a nullity and i'm gonna get ready

to tell you

all the shits you don't realize you

signed up for

when you signed that marriage

certificate that original

uh uh creation or draft

which more than likely well i can state

it is

being monetized that that certificate

created

is proof of the existence of a security

okay so they monetized your original

master application that you and your

husband signed before a notary

whereas the state is required to inform

all parties involving

in writing or by audio or video

and or verbally of the legal

consequences

as follows but not limited to

all right voluntary acknowledgement of

paternity

did you were you informed of that when

you signed that marriage license

high volumes automated administrative

systems what is that are they selling

your

information to interpol who's selling it

to facebook

and foreign countries are they

monetizing your intel

okay proactive matching federal parents

locator service there's another service

that's benefiting from that exemption

account

creating another person so they can

justify getting more

funds out of your estate state parent

locator service national directory of

new hires

state directory of new hires new hire

reporting

uh multi-state financial institute uh

institution data match

uniform interstate family support act

wage withholding

liens on property offset of unemployment

compensation payments

reporting arrearages to credit agencies

to prevent the

undeserved extensions of credit seizure

and sale of personal or real property

seizure of state and federal income tax

refunds revocation of various types of

licenses

driver's license business license

occupational license recreational

license

attachments of lottery winnings and

insurance settlements

of debtor parents requirements that

receipts

of financial assistance from the small

business administration include direct

loans

and loan guarantees must certify that

the receipt

is not more than 60 days delinquent in

the payment of child support

authority to seize assets held by the

public were private retirement funds and

financial institutions

deprivation of a debtor to a fresh start

to discharge a debt completely

pay a percentage of the debt or pay the

full amount

of the debt over a longer period of time

because debts

for child support and alimony are not

dischargeable state or federal

imprisonment fines or both due process

of law

pursuant to public law 103-66 the

omnibus budget reconciliation act of

1993

csea must afford due process safeguards

and 45 cfr 303.101

c2 the due process rights of the parties

involved must be protected and section

466.42

excuse me 466 title 42 usc

666 a3a

must be in full compliance with all

procedural due process requirements

they are denying you due process of law

by not fully informing you

they are concealing these facts as i

read above

from you you have to go find this

completely in another

location in order to find this

information

which means it wasn't provided to you

when you signed so how could you have

been fully cognitive of what you were

signing without having all the

literature

it gets better pursuant to section 466

title 42 usc 666 a5ci

procedural due process requirements

procedures for a simple civil process

for voluntarily acknowledging

paternity under which the state must

provide that before a man or a woman can

sign an acknowledgement of paternity

they must get be given notice

orally or through the use of video or

audio equipment and

in writing c 45 cfr

302.34 title 4d contracts contractor

refers to a government entity

governmental entity with whom the csea

enters into title 4d contract

governmental entity includes the

following entities in the same county

as the csea it does not take a rocket

scientist to see the clear conflict of

interest

a court a prosecutor of law enforcement

officials a sheriff

a clerk a clerk of the court a

recorder's office

a treasurer's office or any other public

or governmental agency or

officials including the governor

d title 31 usc 6305 cooperative

agreements

this is the contract between the state

and the federal office of child support

that only benefits the united states

federal corporation title 28

usc 3002

15 a the department may

enter into cooperative agreements with

the public entities in accordance with

45 title 45 cfr 302.34

and contract with private entities for

the purpose of carrying out the

responsibilities

granted to the vision of ocss office

child support

services as title 40 agency

an executive agency shall use a

cooperative agreement as the legal

instrument reflecting a relationship

between the united states government

and a state a local government or other

recipient

when the principal purpose of the

relationship is to transfer a thing of

value

to the state local government or

the other receipt to carry out a public

government

purpose of support or stimulation

authorized by a law of the united states

federal corporation okay it's a statute

city ordinance code and provision as far

as i'm concerned it's not

law instead of acquiring by purchase

lease or

barter property or service for the

direct benefit of

or use of the united states government

and

two substantial involvement in expected

is expected between the executive agency

and the state local government or other

recipient when carrying out the activity

comp

contemplated in the agreement e title 42

usc 654-3

which is a single and separate entity

title 4-d

child support now we're showing you the

jointer between two corporations

for profit that are making revenue

generating revenue okay through a

promise of the federal government to

compensate them

66 of

every dollar they extort from a man or

woman

all right i'm showing you where they are

now brought down to a mere

status of a corporation and are no

longer functioning

as a government if i didn't articulate

that

beautifully enough with title 28 3002

15a which again is of their own

literature ladies and gentlemen i didn't

write that

they did okay title 42 usc

6543 which is a single and separate

entity title 4d

child support now goes into cooperative

agreement under title 45

cfr 302.34 with the

counties for the benefit of the state

treasury now

let's talk about the benefit of the

state treasury

who pays judges who pays

prosecuting attorney who pays who's the

principal that issues the check

for the agents and agency that operate

uh under the umbrella corporations of

title 28 3002 15a who pays that

well that's none other than the state

treasury

after they get their disbursements from

the federal government for being a

participating member

in the scheme it's in their own

damn literature ladies and gentlemen

they literally

call it a scheme but i'm gonna burn that

turd cutter of yours

with this next statement this is really

gonna grab you by the damn

goat okay this is 27 pages long

of hard-hitting information but here's

what's going to grab you

check this out the american bar

association

helped construct the legislation

for the title 4d which means you can't

hire

a damn lion luton pandering piece of

identified as a lawyer or operating

through title as a lawyer

because it's a clear conflict of

interest they're bar members

and who created the legislation the bar

helped draft the legislation there ain't

one

agent in agency that can come against

you

as a man as a woman in a title 4d

situation

they ain't got it but you have to have

the superior knowledge to be able to

stand upon it

so here we go the state plan will

provide the state

will enter into an agreement agreement

being what a contract between the

federal government and the state

government and then

and then of course the uh counties also

have an agreement with it

and uh the sheriff has an agreement with

it the bailiff has an agreement with it

the judge has

interest in it okay and here's why the

judge has interest if she has

offspring and family that live in her

house um

allegedly these these alleged debts

would affect her family so she has

a financial interest in ensuring that

somebody's paying it not only does she

have a financial interest in that

but she also has a financial interest

because of her contract here under

uh title 45 cfr 302.34

okay they're all bound in this

together

to fleece the american people and it's

basically taxation without

representation but if we can get the

sheep to believe they owe

off to work they'll go all right

which are reflected in a record the

cooperative agreements under 303.107 of

this chapter

with appropriate courts law enforcement

officials such as district attorneys

attorney generals and similar public

attorneys and prosecutors correctional

officers

officials and indian tribes or tribal

organizations such arrangements

may be entered into with single official

covering more than one

court official or agency if the single

official has the legal authority to

enter into an agreement on behalf of the

courts

officials or agencies such arrangements

shall contain provisions for providing

courts and law enforcement officials

with pertinent information needed in

locating non-custodial pay rents

pay rent you've got to pay rent to enjoy

the life that you created that was

blessed upon you by the heavenly father

which is really a gift from the grantor

settler and you are the beneficiary

but if you don't know these things

they're going to run over you

establishing paternity and securing

support to the extent that such

information is relevant to the duties to

be performed pursuant to the agreement

they shall also provide for assistance

to the title 40 agency in carrying out

the program

and may relate to any other matters of

common concern

it's important to note that uh the

uh benefits of the child is merely an

incidental benefit ladies and gentlemen

and i'm going to prove that to you

blessings versus freestone which is five

women who got mad

as hell because they felt entitled to

something so they went to sue the state

and the judge said i'm sorry ladies

title 4d

was actually created for the benefit of

the treasury

wasn't created for you no

and it could only be merely construed as

an incidental benefit to the offspring

because the offspring doesn't have that

right to that parent substance

income whatever you want to call it see

what i'm saying

keep following i'm gonna show you the

dirty little secrets you're doing the

government's laundry and you see a big

skid mark in their tonys and this is

what i'm showing you right here the skid

mark in the chonies

under matters of common concern such

arrangements

may include provisions of the

investigation and

prosecution of fraud directly relating

to paternity

and child and spousal support and

provisions to reimburse

courts and law enforcement officials for

their

assistance assistance they're being

employed

they're hiding the title 4d program

under the executive branch

so what does that mean the separation of

powers is being violated clearly state

clearly separation of power clearly

states the legislative judicial and

executive branch shall forever remain

separate and no

person from one branch sally exercised

the duties

of another granted this is a federal law

nevertheless

it is a law karen lynn oaks is bound by

and you can see i wrote this

this is me hammering away on the judge

hammering away on our barnyard pimp

brandon brownell hanson former

prosecuting attorney

this is me lighting them up all right

because this information right here is

so powerful

that i wasn't going to hold back their

names are in this it's riddled in this

all right and keep in mind this got sent

off to the dod

this guy's sent off to the fbi this got

sent off to all of them

none of them have plausible deniability

at this point because

none of them wrote me back saying you're

incorrect sir and your assessment not a

freaking one of them not an attorney

general

not a governor not a secretary of state

not an fbi agent

nobody not a damn one of them responded

to this

the administrative child support process

created by nebraska or any other state

violates the separation of powers

doctrine by infringing on the district

court's original jurisdiction by

creating a tribunal

which is not inferior to the district

court and by permitting child support

officers to practice law

therefore the statute is

unconstitutional

state of minnesota and supreme court uh

continuation of

f g the executive branch is now in a

contractual agreement

with the su with the courts to provide

assistance

and the executive branch gets reimbursed

for

it i'm showing you the contract

and the flow of the currency the

executive branch is double dipping i.e

committing fraud

and or looting keep in mind they never

responded to me guys

this has been out there for three three

years

three and a half years federal funding

federal funding for the title 4d single

and separate entity hidden in the

executive branch contracted with the

state

is paid to the state treasury two

the state treasury pays all state

employees pensions and salaries

including but not limited to

judges prosecuting attorneys sheriffs

clerks of the court governors

attorney generals you name it they're

all paid through this the list goes on

one can clearly see there is plenty of

incentive to violate a man of his rights

to his privacy and his family title 4d

is a 200 billion

a year industry and each state gets its

piece of the pie in federal funding

by volunteering to participate in a

title 4d

scheme and i said it before and i'll say

it again

title 4d is listed as a scheme in their

own literature guys

i deprivation of rights under color of

law this

list is limited i can go on for months

on rights violated under the color of

law

the acts void legislative acts in

violation of the

constitution or the constitution of the

united states are

void and the judicial judiciary shall

so declare them no man shall be denied

equal protection of the law

now when they're trying to fleece you of

your hard

earnings whatever you want to call it

remember this

they're not taxing that income that goes

to her

okay and it's pulled out before you're

taxed

so let's just say you make 2 000 a month

you're spending 700

in bills they're taking the 66 out of

your income prior to taxes being removed

and then when you get your taxes removed

you don't have enough to pay your

bills

so the court naturally finds that you

are not confident enough to get your

daughter but a box of macaroni and

cheese

once a damn month thus you have

supervised visits for a couple hours

mainly over lunch where you can serve

her chicken lips and buttholes and

and which are hot dogs and macaroni and

cheese

because they've made it so you're

impoverished all right and they've

taken your ability to enjoy equal rights

equal protection of the laws and your

rights the provisions interfere

with the injured party's inherent right

to raise his offspring without

unnecessary government

interference and infringement myers

versus nebraska

important case license suspension

corporation

recreational occupational drivers

without due

process of law they're taking all these

things

without proper notice and do process a

law

involuntary servitude violation of due

process denied rights

to counsel denied liberty denied freedom

denied my fifth amendment and i

denied the sixth amendment denied the

right to offspring whereas 50 50 custody

with my former mate

should be mandatory all right the father

and the mother shall know the offspring

equally

that's equity people it ain't rocket

science

jay section 321 adoption of the uniform

state laws

section uh 466 title 42 usc 666 is

amended by

adding at the end of the following new

subsection

f uniform interstate family support act

in order to satisfy section 45

454 20a on and

after january 1st 1998 each state

must have in effect the uniform

interstate family support act

it was mandated ladies and gentlemen

that they go into

business and then they have to

voluntarily comply

in order to receive the funding which

they're all voluntarily complying which

means they're

liable

as approved by the american bar

association february 9 1993

federal manual of child support ocse

also provides under a contract with the

american bar association

ocsc of office of child support

enforcement agency responsible for the

administration

of the child support enforcement program

created by title d

title 4d of the social security act of

1975

ocse is responsible for developing child

support

policies not law

policies guys oversight evaluation and

audits of state and tribal child support

programs

you can't hire an attorney without there

being a conflict of interest

period the judge can't sit on the bench

without being a conflict of interest

because the u.s supreme court

has said it firm in the united states

corporation world the fictional realm

that you must be a bar attorney in order

to be a judge

all right and providing technical

assistance and training

to those programs who the hell do you

think

is teaching these judges how to

administer the title ford east game

why do you think they go to seminars

ladies and gentlemen

to learn the new way of fleecing people

and make it somehow

look legitimate without being able to

produce a bill

how do you have a debt if nobody can

produce a bill

we're going to get to that in a moment

ocsc operates the federal parent locator

service

which includes the national directory of

new hires and the federal case registry

ladies and gentlemen i don't care what

states you go to if you're trying to get

your head back above water and you're

like i just got to get out of this

county if i get out of this county

you know i can get another job yeah and

my bank account will start to grow again

and i can start to provide for my family

but if i stay here and i stay stagnant

the system is so

atrociously rigged that i'm

gonna end up in prison every three

months

because i cannot give them what they're

asking of me

because if i do i don't have the ability

to eat

so i'm forced into a situation where i

have to accept

more benefits from the state that are

really coming from my own e-state that

was probated at my birth

see what i'm saying here ladies and

gentlemen they're taking your

inheritance from you and they're

they've got you locked in a prison in

your mind believing that somehow you're

a deadbeat

i'm here to tell you right now they know

exactly what they're doing

and this is proof of it i can show you

all the green cards

registered mail that i sent out to these

agencies ain't a one of the head of

those agencies that can deny it

all right i wasn't writing to the piss

ants i was writing to the alleged man

the head of the corporation

or division of corporation that he works

for okay

this is so important because i see so

many families

divided over this illusion of

money or currency and uh the truth of

the matter is

you and i as americans just as man

are owed for the

unbelievable um

double speaking language that they've

thrust us into the fictional realm

and we have to come out of the fictional

realm and this is how i did it

this is what taught me that if

everything

in here is true and nobody responds to

then what else is the government doing

that's an absolute scheme

and it just started to unravel and

unfold and the more i researched the

magna carta

the palpables the unum sanctum

and i got back to 516 during the

the reign of justinian and i started

looking at all these things

it's undeniable that there has been a

system set up

with the sole purpose of manipulating

the masses into becoming voluntary

slaves

okay what i'm pointing out here is this

is a

policy not a law oversight evaluation

and audits of

state and tribunal child support

programs and providing technical

assistance and training

to those programs ocse operates the

federal parent locator service which

includes the national directory of new

hires

and new federal case registry so no

matter where you go

they will find you they didn't disclose

this information to you that they were

going to take your pertinent

private information and sell it off to

all these companies

you're due rights titles dividends

interest trust res rents

derivatives head events general

tangibles general intangibles channels

and securities

from what they sold because they sold

your property as a

product that they had nothing to do with

ocse office of child support enforcement

is part of the administration

for children and families acf within the

department of health and human services

dhhs

this info provided by the glossary of

common child support terms

the american bar association approves 90

percent

of child support provisions now law

provisions and policies ladies and

gentlemen

association means the american bar

association and illinois corporation

incorporated on december 7

1992. you cannot hire

a bar member to represent you as there

is a clear conflict of interest as a bar

member

not only has an obligation to the court

as an officer of the court

the bar member also is in con is

contracted

to the ocse office of child support

enforcement

through the american bar association all

right

okay a business also known as an

enterprise

agency or a firm is an entity involved

in the provisions of

goods and or services to custom

consumers

consumer goods protection act ladies and

gentlemen

businesses are prevalent in capitalism

capitalist economies

where most of them are privately owned

and provide

goods and services to customers in

exchange for other goods and services

or money what is the government

state federal local municipalities all

doing they're engaged in business

and when they're engaged in business

they're no longer acting as government

but are mere corporations and can be

sued

and are personally liable for their

actions

not only that the moto propia that was

signed in 2013

by the pope uh pretty much reversed the

unum sanctum

basically dissolving all corporations

and if you know anything about this

you realize that everything was created

at the vatican

the us military is the war machine

uh world police power and england and

switzerland are the bank

all right there's your three powers

right there

and uh when you start to understand this

scheme when you start to really

realize how this works and you paid

attention to what the pope did

the pope has so much power because

he who creates his master and the

vatican

created the the pope through the

principle known as the vatican

identified as the vatican which the

vatican's not real it's just a title

ladies and gentlemen

the vatican is a political group of

people that work

underneath a name okay and they've done

some immoral

obviously but they created the system

and the system

was corporations so i was once watching

an interview

of a uh

a lawyer who had stated that uh you know

uh you can't hurt the dead

and i thought about it for a long time

and i'm like he was laughing about it

because people were

hurt by the decisions being made in the

courts and

there was a legitimate question how do

you feel about the people

that are hurting this and he said you

can't hurt the dead

meaning you're the one coming in there

and volunteering to be that entity

nobody made you do that and if you don't

know your rights you have no rights and

because you're there voluntarily

you're volunteering information you're

alleging to be the name

which can't be the name and uh so now

you're standing in a surety but you

don't

understand your right to be availed you

don't comprehend your right

to subrogation and you stand in their

surety and they place your body

in a box to ensure that you're not

killed while their bonds mature and

those securities mature so they can

whisk them away after you abandon them

anyway off on a tangent there let's get

back to child support

and the scheme of all schemes all right

the the cse child support support uh

child support enforcement agency must

charge an application

fee okay that means that they're in

business they're not government

they're charging a fee for a service

which means they're in business

commercially they're no longer

government they never were government

ladies and gentlemen

not to exceed twenty five dollars for

families not on welfare verifying they

have

customers and are a single and separate

unit from the government

case law clearfield trust versus the

united states 318

u.s 363 369. 1943.

now the reason i'm pointing out this

date to you is basically after 1935 the

judges all came together in a secret

meeting

and decided they were going to handle

affairs a little differently

and it was going to benefit the public

which is not you and i as man and woman

all right this court case is absolutely

relevant

the us supreme court stated the

government descends to the level of a

mere private corporation and takes

all the character of a mere private

citizen

where private commercial paper notes and

securities are concerned

for purposes of suit such corporations

and individuals are regarded

as an entity entirely separate from the

government which means

they no longer have qualified immunity

and now they are personally liable for

the harm they cause

i as a man for their trespass by way of

extortion

by way of debt uh by way of theft

by way of fraud the list just goes on

the trespasses are egregious

all right and trespass leads to treason

okay breach of their fiduciary duty

breach of their oath of office

breach of the public trust reach

commercial law breach commercial

contract

breach of their own policies i

mean you just go on and on and on

on on for days of the that they're

getting away with because we're asleep

at the wheel

case law united states versus bird 309

us 242 the supreme court stated

when government enters into the world of

commerce

okay they are subject to the same

burdens as any private firm or

corporation

what does that mean that means they can

be sued and they can sue

all right no more qualified immunity

title 4d accepts private commercial

paper notes

in the form of 25 which are really frn

notes and nobody can

to the state and the court and all state

courts that i've been to

nobody although they're extremely sharp

i'm sure after

seven years of law school nobody can

define what a dollar is

ain't that cute nobody can tell me what

an frn note is

i mean i i realize it's abbreviated but

you know what's your interest in me

giving you

somebody else's intellectual property in

order to resolve said debt

can you tell me what your financial

interest is in the federal reserve

bank and the federal reserve bank notes

that are private

property of a private corporation

privately owned and trademarked and

copyrighted

i just need an explanation please what's

your innocent explanation

for asking me for such a thing how do i

acquire it where do i get them

when did they get them how do they make

them you know who what when where

why are your six best friends and will

kick ass every time

okay so title 4d accepts private

commercial paper notes in the form of 25

frn notes application fee for services

it provides to the customer rendering

title 4d child support

a single and separate agency not part of

the government and just to clarify here

we got to go back to federal reserve

notes because i have so much fun playing

with these guys

a federal reserve note is a future

promise to pay

it is not i repeat it is not

a payment okay l

who is the person persons depriving

living men and women of their rights

title 42 usc 6543 single and separate uh

uni uh unit title 4d child support

2 title title 45 cfr 302.34

is the county's political subdivisions

and their contracts and all the cronies

that work for them all the agents and

agency from the sheriff's department

police department they're all wrapped up

in it all right the

county attorneys wrapped up in it the

clerk of the court's wrapped up in it

like i said the governor they're all

unjustly enriching themselves at your

guys's

peril that's your guys's suffering and

the reason i can use the word suffering

is because you're volunteering

you're volunteering because you lack the

knowledge and it tells us in the bible

my people

shall suffer for their lack of knowledge

and that's exactly what's happening

and that's why i do these videos to help

you guys out because i really

am sick and tired of reading the paper

and seeing people commit suicide

over false and fictitious claims that

could be easily defeated if we could

just get out of our mindset

our indoctrination okay

partnership between federal office of

child support enforcement is in fact

in a partnership with the executive

branch of every state

all 50 of them ladies and gentlemen this

parent a partnership

is with the federal government and the

state government under the executive

branch

then they then they created the title 42

usc 6543

and place it under the executive branch

and then that separate

and single unit title 4d goes into

title 45 cfr 302.34

political subdivision counties it goes

into the political subdivisions and

counties

so the sheriff signed on with 302.34

the prosecutor signed on with 302.34 and

this is the contract and the proof of

the contract is found

and title 45 cfr 302.34 okay

what i'm giving you is the bullets to

your gatling gun you just got to get the

rust

off that brain and be able to come in

and articulate this okay and if you

can't articulate it

type it up read it study it

send it off all right it's not hard

freedom isn't free ladies and gentlemen

it never has been free if you believe

that it's free you live in the greatest

optical illusion ever created by man

and that's the illusion of freedom being

free freedom has never been free

you have to fight for it all right

and how do we fight what's the best way

to fight the best way to fight is to be

sensible to come in in good faith

good reason with good conscience in

order to find remedy

that's all we're here for i'm here for

remedy

i'm not a enemy belligerent combatant of

the united states i'm not a us citizen

i'm a man i'm an ambassador of peace i'm

a bond servant of christ you know

and i'm here to provide remedy that's it

it's

really really really simple

but in order to simplify it you have to

understand how this is working because

this what i'm showing you

is just business all right

m color law color of law refers to an

appearance of

legal power to act that may operate

in violation of law what

wait a minute here that sounds like an

oxymoron i

i know legal and lawful and i i'm a

legal and a lawful man

wow what a statement right let me remind

you something ladies and gentlemen

slavery was legal what do you think

about legal now

huh slavery was legal all right

so all you people out there go i'm legal

just remember just because it's legal

doesn't mean it's moral

doesn't mean it's lawful okay you want

to know how i'm prevailing in court 13

and 0.

a reasonable man of sound mind able to

articulate the difference between

legal and lawful real simple

okay just bring forth the man or woman

that i've caused harm injury damage and

lost you i provide i'm here today to

provide remedy

i notice that the pleading isn't sworn

to there's no affidavit in tote

uh or or or uh an affidavit that's been

a launch

to the alleged claim uh it also doesn't

have an independent uh

bond to it a hazard bond in case some

caused harm injury damage and loss

by somebody in here that may or may not

notice i say may or may not be

committing fraud upon the court bringing

folsom fictitious claims

under false and fictitious names trying

to ensnare me in their scheme

huh yeah you like that oh they love it

they start shaking you can hear their

pocket change starts shaking when you

start talking like that because they go

stepped on a land mine every once in a

while they step on a land mine and then

they got to figure out how they can make

it look legitimate and dismiss it

without anybody else in the community

waking up to the ponzi scheme

that's afoot so colorado law has an

appearance of law

but is not in most instances law

now what do i mean by that let me help

provide clarity for that

there are times when legal and lawful

are in harmony and you will even find it

in the ucc

i don't have it off the top of my head

which is rather strange but i've done

forgotten more than most people

learn i can assure you that and it's not

to be cocky it's just literally

you have to go back and reread this

stuff and they

it's subject to change it may be ucc

1-103 one

one year and two years from now it can

be found in ucc 3-306

but not to subvert from what i'm saying

legal and lawful

there are times that i agree with them

and even in the ucc it will articulate

to you

how legal lawful the commercial

all shall be in harmony and if they're

not in harmony

and legal is ever in conflict with

lawful

lawful will prevail that's equity ladies

and gentlemen what should be done

shall be done period all right

it's not the form but rather the intent

okay so my point to this

murder is illegal murder

is also unlawful all right

letter of the law spirit of law when

when they are conjoined in harmonious

that is the only time i agree

with legal because a man of sound

principles could never

argue the opposite right murder is

innately wrong

throughout the world it is wrong

to with with intent and malice cause

somebody harm injury damage or loss to

the point where they lose their life

right okay so

murder is wrong and that's what i'm

trying to get get across to you there

are times when legal and lawful are in

harmony

man basically just takes god's law and

twists it and manipulates it into their

own words saying say we created this

it's patented it's copywritten you can't

use that not without our authority

see how legal tries to commingle and

give the the

resemblance of law but it really isn't

law

so they give themselves a little bit of

legitimacy by using law

and implementing it into their system

so let's get deeper let's get deeper

color of law refers to an appearance of

legal

power to act that may operate in

violation

of law for example if a police officer

acts with the color of law

authority to arrest someone the rest if

it is made without probable cause

may actually be in violation of the law

why because that man who sometimes acts

as an agent in agency it costed me

against my will absent a victim absent a

crime and violated my rights

i'm due restitution i'm due and owing

for the unlawful taking and theft of my

time

and not only that a trespass by way of

extortion

okay that has caused me harm and the

slander and defamation of character

that has come of it because well let's

just face it

ninety percent of american people see a

cop arrested somebody and they believe

they're guilty well he must have done

something wrong

cop wouldn't just go around arresting

people cop wouldn't go around just

shooting on our own people

cop wouldn't go around just beating the

out of people and using chemical

weapons on people in their automobiles

for not showing a license cop would

never do that right

right glad you guys are still with me

so the another important point

to make on my rant here is that

if if they

state that they are operating under

color of law

it is a complete contradiction to also

state

that they are doing things in good faith

now title 50 4305 b2 tells us that when

we do things in good faith ladies and

gentlemen

that we can't be accosted against our

will and imprisoned for it all right

now color of law has the appearance of

law but is not

law and when i do things in good faith

it's my intent to be a lawful man right

but if you openly admit

to utilizing the color of law which has

the appearance of law but really isn't

law and you cause me harm injury damage

or loss

you're now personally liable for your

trespass against

against i as a man okay

it's real simple

um in other words just because something

is done with the color of law doesn't

mean that the

action was lawful when police act

outside their lawful authority and

violate

the civil rights and we're going to get

back to civil rights in a minute because

of this

remember i was young when i wrote this

up i was young

of a man the fbi is tasked with

investigating all right

well the fbi they're supposed to be

investigating all this but they don't

all right they're

too busy trying to cover up hillary

clinton's scandals and joe biden

scandals and joe biden's son scandals to

really give a

about doing what they're really tasked

with which is a job to keep the

judiciary in line

and judges abiding by the constitution

all right and they're not doing their

job

so we have to step up right enough point

fingers it's time for us to stand up and

say enough and how do we do it we

ascended the mind

so color of law does not mean that the

action was lawful when police act

outside their lawful authority and

violate civil rights

civil rights civil rights are a

privilege

i have unalienable rights civil rights

are granted by the establishment

what i'm trying to tell you is i

up by writing civil rights there

okay so note to everybody watching

i was younger when i put this together

thought i understood the words that i

was using

but again we lean into equity and we go

okay obviously we're seeing his intent

where he's going with this we know he's

talking about his

unalienable rights as a man okay

so that's the beauty of equity but you

have to have the eyes to see it and

that's where your

you're you're uh imploring equity

because the conflict of variance between

the rules

of equity and the rules of the alleged

law

all right the u.s supreme court has

interpreted the u.s constitution

to constru construct laws regulating

the actions of the law enforcement

community under color of law it is

it is a crime for one or more persons

using power given by a government agency

local state or federal to deprive any

right protected

by the constitution or laws of the

united states

criminal acts under color of law include

acts within and beyond the bounds

or limits of lawful authority off-duty

conduct may also be covered in official

status

is asserted in some manner color of law

may include public officials and

non-governmental employees

who are not law enforcement officers

such as judges

prosecutors and private security guards

blessings versus freestone

overwhelmingly clear

on the matter not only of color of law

also definitively proving that there are

no child support laws but rather

provisions ladies and gentlemen no laws

just provisions okay provisions

implemented for the benefit of the

public treasury in each state

it has nothing to do with your offspring

for you people out there thinking that

somehow the government cares about

you they love you i got news for you

everything they do is to deceive you

defraud you

and belittle you without your cognitive

awareness

okay and about the time you fi you

figured out

it's it's purposely written in different

forms and languages and

and areas to make you look delusional

and crazy

so no one will listen to you my own

family disowned me for a while over this

stuff guys

well if you love your daughter just take

care of her man i'm

trying i'm building a company

i'm four years deep things are looking

bright no loans from a bank i'm doing

all right

just need people get off my ass i'm

doing the best i can with what i got

and i'm not on state benefits and i'm

not reaching out to the government for

assistance and i'm doing what i've

always been taught

never realizing that what i'd been shown

what i've been taught was wrong

wrong 1933 the banking act of 1913.

i mean you go back to the 1800s all

all the uh all the alleged debt all the

bankruptcies when you start to really

see that you were pledged as

chattel which means you're a freaking

slave owned by the imf ladies and

gentlemen

and if you accept it then it is as such

when you know who you are you have

rights titles interest dividends

derivatives debentures henderman's

general tangibles

general intangibles trust res rents

rights duties and obligations you have

you have all kinds of stuff

channels securities but only when you

know who you are

all right in positive law

office of law revision counsel united

states codes child support

is not enacted into positive law what's

positive law ladies and gentlemen let's

just think about that for just a second

because it's important to comprehend

positive law is something

all nations uh respect

positive law is this murder is innately

wrong there's nobody in the world that

can say

murder is justifiable killing on the

other hand is a different story

all right killing in the name of

preservation of life your safety

your family's well-being justifiable

murder however

with intent to cause somebody else harm

injury damage or loss that is not a

threat to you

is in fact wrong and it's positive law

that murder is innately wrong

okay that's positive law that's the best

way i can articulate it to the layman

so you can comprehend what positive law

is and what it means

thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife

positive law

thou shall not uh commit adultery

positive law

thou shall not steal positive law okay

unanimously across the board theft is

wrong it's wrong

period i don't care how you spin it that

by taking

you know here's the legal version of it

well steph uh here's the lawful version

uh theft by taking right and the legal

version is stealing

by taking okay um and and here's the

difference

they've got theft by receiving

well if you received it and you didn't

know it was stolen are you really guilty

of anything

no the answer is no but i see people go

to jail all the time for it

oh i i just recently saw a case it was

theft by receiving and uh you know

the prosecutor goes well you know john

henry doe smith here

uh did have in his possession at the

time the officers engaged him

uh one uh unicorn and that

unicorn was stolen from miss abrams on

the night of

you know the 29th of september and uh

so we're also charging in the state

would find that you find him guilty on

theft by receiving

and and the young man just sat there

mute and i was like oh my gosh

he just slit his own throat and is

volunteering to go to jail

for something that he had no knowledge

of and you could see it in his eyes

he didn't object he didn't assert

himself he didn't use his right to

allocution

he didn't stand up and go this is a

false and fictitious claim with no no

verified

claimant uh bringing forward sworn

testimony willing to take the stand i'm

invoking my sixth amendment

i'm standing on the sixth amendment uh

i'm gonna stand above it and

under it and on it i'm i'm invoking the

sixth amendment my right to face my

accuser you better bring them forward

ladies and gentlemen

or this case is dismissed and if we

proceed on as a trial de novo

you all know better than to bring a

claim for which relief cannot be granted

not having a damn plaintiff get out of

here with that

alright i as a man i'm entitled to hear

what another

man has to say that caused him harm

injury damage or lost through my actions

and i as a man just want to provide

remedy to that man

can that man come forward today or is

somebody in here a lion looting pattern

pieces of

bringing forward a false and fictitious

claims using folsom fictitious names

without being independently bonded not

having

an affidavit submitted

on record supporting the claim being

brought forward

could it be there's a rat in the wood

pile

and positive law office of law revision

counsel united states codes child

support is not enacted into positive law

the term positive law has

a long established meaning in the legal

philosophy but has a narrow meaning when

referring to titles

of the code title 42 usc

1983 civil action for deprivation of

rights

is positive law as it applies to every

man and woman

okay that applies to every man and woman

i don't use that i would rather just go

after him

privately and do my private

administrative process and hold my own

court and default them that way

because i'm after ass and badges and ass

is short for assets

i'm looking for assets and badges i

don't give a about their currency

all right oh positive law versus

non-positive law

titles one a positive law title

of the code is itself a federal statute

a non-positive law title

of the code is an uh editorial

complication

of federal statutes for example title 10

armed forces

is a positive law title because the

title itself has been enacted by

congress

all right by contrast title 42 usc

the public health and welfare is a

non-positive law

title 42 usc 666 is in fact where child

support is operated

and ran from and is not enacted into

positive law

title 40d is under the social security

act and has not been enacted into

positive law

uh number five a united states code

the matter set forth in the addition of

the code of laws of the united states

current

at any time shall together with the with

the then current supplement if any

established prima facie

evidence or primo fossa the laws of the

united states

general and permanent in their nature in

force

on the day preceding the commencement of

the session

following the last session of the

legislator which is included provide

however that whenever titles of such

code shall

have been enacted into positive law the

text therefore

shall be legal evidence of the laws

therein contained

in all the courts of the united states

the several states

and the territories and insular

possessions of the united states

therefore title 42 usc

666 the child support provisions used to

deprive me of my

rights my unalienable rights are not

legal evidence of law

it is done under color of law so i just

removed their veil the emperor wears no

clothes

look at his little smackle you know you

can see it everybody point and laugh

they're all gonna laugh at you judge

i just removed your clothes your garb

your drape

you have no immunity no protection

period all right and you can't possibly

be operating

in good faith because your actions show

otherwise

i derek's tongue is also being deprived

rights privileges and immunities under

color of law

i derek's tom gonzalez was born free

free means not subject a legal

constraint

of another not hard people

i am no longer free having the power to

dictate

upon my own free will according to title

4d order

if i do not comply as requested i

derek's tongue gonzales i'm subject to

what

jail license suspension commercial and

recreational license suspension wage

withholding tax withholding

rights to my offspring the right to

acquire property the right to pursue

happiness the right to privacy the right

to protect my reputation

the right to independent and equal uh

protection of the law

the right to not self-incriminate

federal grants and loans for businesses

etc all while being denied my right to

due process

which is yet again another rights

violation

executed by persons usc

uh 654-3 title 4d

and is contracted agents

cfr 302.34

counties agents and agency and political

subdivisions

it's important to note i received not

one letter from the fbi

secret service dod doj

doj criminal division um

the i can't there were so many agents i

wrote

and i got no response out of this guys

do you know how powerful this is

none no response means the next time you

come at me

lucy you got some damn splaining to do

because

there is an inquiry before this this

this

corporation and by god the heaven be

willing

the great divine creator give me

strength you will answer this first

my controversy takes precedent over your

innocuous

to lie loot plunder and steal

from me

[Music]

number 10 who are the persons in

violation of title 42 usc 654-3 title 4d

and the title 45 cfr 302.34

counties agents and agency political

subdivisions

okay city state counties they're all

guilty

they are persons all right not men and

women persons corporations

have trustees that are working for them

and are corpus juris

or excuse me am jurisprudence

63 charlie 2d states that all public

officials agents and agency

are in fact trustees of the american

people

period end of freaking story

judge are you denying the trust are you

disclaiming the trust

are you saying that it's not there oh i

dare

i dare a public official to answer that

one incorrectly

boy oh boy would their nuts be on the

chopping block immediately

warring against the constitution which

is in fact a trust document

it's a trust document i'm not a signer

to it absolutely not

but it's the intent of the testator

the grantor settler at that moment in

time did i not

be frivolously accosted against my will

that i not be forced to warehouse any

agent and agency

that i not be forced to testify against

myself and incriminate myself

that i have the right to be secure my

persons paper

houses property and effects which is

really what

ladies and gentlemen the pursuit of

happiness all right

provided i do what do no harm to another

man or woman

period

they are persons and do not have

immunity the usc

type 66543

which is title 42 6543

is a single and separate unit if

it is a single and separate unit from

the government with customers

how do they have 11th amendment immunity

well i went ahead and answered that for

them

they do not nobody wrote me back said

derek you're absolutely wrong

you're on crack lay off the drugs buddy

quit hitting the bottle

go to sleep quit studying this stuff not

not one letter

not not not uh yeah you're correct we're

so sorry

um we're gonna correct this right now

the least they could have done was

telling me you i mean i i could at

least respected that hey derek hey by

the way

you oh okay well all right cool

no response sometimes is the biggest

insult a man can receive

uh it's it's frustrating but at the same

time it's very gratifying to know

checkmate checkmate i got you

p presentment of bills okay now

in the child support hearing they allege

that i owe a debt well in order to be

a debt understanding commercial law

there has to be a true bill to annoying

before it could be

a debt there would have to be a true

bill

and the true bill i learned about this

uh unwittingly and unknowingly

running my own businesses doing my own

private thing

as private trade in order to survive

create a living right and it's it's

funny because you create an

estimate and everybody goes over the

estimate and we agree

and we understand that there's maybe a

five percent margin on the estimate to

go up and down either way

all right it can be for the homeowner's

benefit it could be for my benefit but i

gotta leave some leeway in there because

again it's just an estimate

and they may you know the materials may

fluctuate or whatever over time

as we're getting the project done so we

need that three to five percent leeway

there

and that's the estimate a bid is

something solid and firm right

so we got the estimate we get the

estimate signed i have the estimate

in my hands i am now the holder in due

course and this is what i found

interesting about banking

having that instrument in my hand i

could literally go to the bank

and give them that estimate that signed

contract to perform

the work and they would lend me the

funds

based off that agreement you can call it

a promissory note

you can call it contract and give a

what you call it

they can monetize it and that by itself

was proof of how the banking system

works

that we as private men and women can

create our own instruments

okay we can create our own contracts and

the bank will

be more than happy to take that slip of

paper from you and monetize it because

they know you don't have enough common

sense to ask for it back when that

contract is completed

you do all those rights titles interest

if they monetized it for

whatever it was you do all that back in

only

once you satisfy the contract

so once the

work is done the next step as a man

engaged in business or fair trade is to

correct

correct the record because it was an

estimate maybe we were under by

a thousand dollars so we take a thousand

dollars off the eight thousand dollar

bill it's now seven

thousand dollar true bill do and owing

i give notice to the homeowner that

there's a true bill to annoying for

eight thousand dollars

and i have the original in my hand which

is evidence of the debt and i have or is

evidence of

the payment due right and i have

evidence

of the signed contract estimate to

perform the task at hand

everything's satisfactory everything's

done and i send them notice

and they decide not to pay their bill

okay the true bill doing owing then i

move

in a private administrative process to

default them

is it your intent not to pay this bill

it's doing owing i'll give you 10 days

to respond if you don't respond

i'm going to presume and assume that

it's your intent by your tacit agreement

and acquiescence

to shirk your responsibilities and

obligations and not pay this bill

and in doing so you're going to cause me

harm uh

trespass by way of debt at this point

because

if you're shirking your obligation now

it becomes a debt and

that's trespassed by way of debt it's

not trust passed by way of bill

it's trust passed by way of debt the

bill was the positive credit that was

owed to me by denying it to me now it's

a trespass right

and it's trespass by way of debt failure

to pay your obligation

as an obligor

the child support agency can never

produce a true bill do in

owing with a wet ink signature stating

who what when where how and why

itemized list of how i owe this alleged

debt

and if you're alleging that it's a debt

then there must first have been a bill

and if there was no bill then it's a

denial of due process

and they're bringing forward a false

claim for which relief cannot be granted

i can't satisfy something that wasn't

brought true correct

and proper okay do you have a demand

response within

within so many days and if they do not

respond in a time

they are in default yes i'm explaining

that process

it's really simple it's a i actually

learned it from the credit card

companies i started watching what the

credit card companies were doing they

would send a letter

you know there's this alleged debt doing

owing and they would send a statement

never a bill

and i'd ignore it and then all of a

sudden i get this default notice from

the court after

six months of ignoring them they

defaulted me and

and basically they're doing the same

thing that i'm explaining to you

now how to administer a private

administrative process

our process is a little different

because commercially

they get away with uh murder essentially

they don't notarize anything they don't

sign anything the ceo doesn't sign

anything these people aren't

actually doing their jobs and and

holding any liability

they're doing it under the guys that you

don't know what's going on

and under the consumer protection act

you have a right to be made whole you

have a right to be protected it's your

credits they're holding on to so anyway

we'll get back into child support i just

wanted you to comprehend and i hope it

did a good job of explaining it

if there's no true bill doing owing

then there isn't a debt and you're about

to find out

how deep i'm willing to go on this

because i articulate it very beautifully

in the next few pages here resentment of

the bill standing

substantiating the alleged allegation of

an existing debt

owed all right now derek's tongue

gonzales have demanded the presentment

of the original bill

come forward if you're the true holder

in due course of the original instrument

i just need to see

it bring it forward multiple times from

the alleged prosecuting attorney brandon

braun al-hansen

of valley county nebraska brandon

brunell hanson who

i i always called him karen lynn knocks

barnyard pimp because that's what they

are those little prosecutors are just

barnyard pams brandon bronnell hanson

has

failed to produce the original bill well

if there's no

original document no original bill

wedding signature who the hell's got the

balls to make a claim like this

and not be independently bonded well

i'll tell you who had the balls to do it

brandon brought l hanson

like a jack wagon to substantiate the

alleged allegation of a debt

brandon ball hanson has fi failed to

provide power of attorney for the state

of nebraska which is his alleged client

no more real than kris kringle easter

bunny tooth fairy you know you name it

whatever you want to call it

um or piper madison gonzalez alleged

plaintiff originate

terry baker alleged payee which he

proclaims to be conducting doing

business on behalf of

but as i articulated to you earlier

he's not doing business on behalf of any

of that he's doing

business on behalf of the state treasury

brandon brownell hansen so i mean

there's forged documents all over false

and fictitious claims using false and

fictitious names trying to extort

from i as a man my way of making a

living

ronaldo hanson has failed to provide an

affidavit of truth

from his alleged plaintiff affiant

stating harm injury and or loss or

rights that i have been

uh that i have that have been violated

brandon brownell hansen has failed to

produce

his alleged license issued by the state

of nebraska to practice law because that

was a fun one

and a little story a little ditty about

that i've got some very very very

learned friends

uh i would put them against anybody in a

court of law

and uh or atlaw in-law whatever you want

to call it

and uh they're so sharp if they're in

the wrong they'll tell you right away

hey i'm in the wrong i'm not gonna win

this i'm in the wrong

they're correcting their assessment what

they're doing we're wrong um

needless to say i brought him in as

counsel

and in the constitution it doesn't say i

have a right to an attorney a lying

looting pandering piece of

says i have a right to counsel and then

there's a maximum law that says he who

makes a hasty decision

without consulting counsel first when

consulting council

is in vain and i paraphrase that so it's

horribly wrong

but you get the gist of it he who does

something ill-advised and then comes

back for advisement after the fact it's

always in vain

all right karen lynn oak's alleged

non-biased third party judge stands firm

that one must possess such a license in

order to

represent an a affiant or plaintiff

well an affianthro plaintiff are in the

fictional realm so i agree with that but

on the other hand

you've got me in there as a man under

threat dressing quarters and saying that

if i don't

show up you're going to arrest me so

i'm naturally here and uh i'm not here

to defend or represent

myself i am myself so who's got the true

bill doing that it caused harm injury

damage lost to

what financial interest do they have

what species do they require and i'll go

out there and provide remedy right now

all i need is a man or woman to come

forward oh you see derek the state

is alleging the state you lying

looting pattern piece of

you're full of crap and how do i know

he's full of crap because he clearly

understands

the sixth amendment is not only

uh there to protect my unalienable right

to face my accuser

but also there to protect me from being

fleeced

so they can unjustly enrich themselves

so we know that he's in collusion

and and uh conspiracy against you as a

man

to fleece you of your labor all right

and get documents from you because they

can monetize

them this is my issue when i started

seeing this stuff for the first time

guys this is what got me

into the books looking at it talking to

very articulate intelligent people

day in and day out and i'm talking about

lawyers that have been in the business

for 35 to 40 years

and i was talking with them and they're

going look what you're discovering we

figured out when we were in our mid-20s

what did you want us to do

stand up sound off like you got a pair

this country's in trouble

so derek everything you're learning is

true it's all smoke and mirrors buddy

keep going keep up the good fight but

unfortunately at this point

i can't help you anymore and please

don't contact me from this point on

okay because it's dangerous ladies and

gentlemen

but the encouragement from this man

redeeming his soul by telling a young

man who is hard pressed for the truth

the whole truth and nothing but the

truth i have some admiration for that

man

i have some admiration for that man

because everybody else in my family

thought i was crazy everybody else was

telling me i was wrong i was suffering

from ptsd if you will and and rightfully

all of you suffer from ptsd because

you've been lied to your entire life and

coming out of this is going to be a

shell shocker

it's a big deal some of you aren't cut

out

for what this entails some of you will

fall back in line and it's okay

it's not for everybody there are some of

us that are just naturally born

fighters and warriors and we're supposed

to defend

protect the weak defend the poor and

and and bring stability throughout the

community

the the warriors men and women alike

even offspring believe it or not i've

seen some young

13 14 year old kids that can articulate

equity like you wouldn't believe and i

know it's because their parents

their mother and father instilled good

traits and qualities in them

and it's just amazing so you can learn

from everybody i learn even from the

most ignorant

men and women in offspring i i do

and and you'd be foolish not to you know

what's impressive

is uh something i i came to

to acknowledge as a young man i've never

learned from a physical fight that i've

won

i've never learned anything from it um

but i've always learned from a from a

physical fight that i've lost

i learned how to duck how to move faster

how not to stand in one place

so sometimes getting knocked down ladies

and gentlemen is just

part of the process of growth and it's

painful

and when it's painful so often we learn

those lessons

and uh and we make sure not to make

those same mistakes right

so brandon brownell hansen has failed to

present documentation establishing he

has bonded on

ci 1658 valley county nebraska district

court

in the event he causes harm to eye

derek's tongue gonzalez

you know as a man the original bill is

required and

a crucial element for standing before

the court without a

bill in question the element of

jurisdiction cannot be established nor

can relief be granted

do you guys understand how powerful that

statement is i'm here to provide remedy

i just need the bill give me the bill so

i can assess it

i'll sign off on it and we can take care

of this matter

they never could produce the bill they

created an impossibility

brand brawl now hanson contracted under

uh cfr 302.34 is not only an agent and

agency for the title 4d agency through

usc 6543 but also is contracted through

the nebraska bar association

ladies and gentlemen clear conflict

interest period

brandon bernal hansen has failed to

establish jurisdiction for and on

the official record when challenged

brandon hansen has failed to produce

and present his oath of office and bond

upon request

i direct tom gonzalez cannot accept the

original bill if brandon

bronnell hanson refuses to present it

ladies and gentlemen

how can i accept and acknowledge

something how can i remain an honor

if you won't give me what you allege you

have

so i can honor it if brandon bernal

hansen has the original bill and will

not present it to i derek chaton

gonzales

then it is clear brandon bronnell hansen

is in violation of my right

to stand in honor and fulfill my

obligation as a man

that's all i want to do i just want to

be a man i want to be treated like man

want to treat others like men and women

that they are i want to treat everybody

with respect

but don't question my intelligence by

pissing on my back and trying to

convince me

that it's raining if brandon brownell

hansen does not have

in his possession hold her in due course

ladies and gentlemen

original bill one can stand to reason

that brandon braun al-hansen may be

perpetrating fraud against i derek's

tongue gonzales also bringing fraud upon

the court

under the guise of the color of law as

an agent and agency contractor through

the title 4g

agency usc 6543 title 4d

through his contract cfr 302.34

for the benefit of the state treasury of

nebraska as well as brandon brought al

hansen's

personal gain unjust enrichment ladies

and gentlemen

all right karen lynn knox alleged third

party non-biased judge karen lynn

noakes failed to produce her oath of

office and bond upon demand of i derek

tom gonzales

karen linoaks entered a plea allegedly

on behalf of the alleged defendant

derek's tom gonzalez

it is very clear a plea was entered on

behalf

and collected in interest of the

prosecuting attorney brandon braun

al-hansen valley county prosecuting

attorney so they could proceed with the

fleecing

that's conspiracy ladies and gentlemen

bam

nobody rebutted it karen lynn oaks

denied i derek's tongue gonzales the

right to enter into an informed plea by

failing to answer questions pertaining

to jurisdiction

denial of my substantial rise in due

process of law

guilty nobody rebutted it karen lynn

knows failure to acknowledge questions

being asked by derek's tom gonzalez

showed a clear bias

in favor of the prosecution as well as

exhibited exported behavior

now this statement right here exhibited

ex parte behavior i can prove it but the

officers and agents that were in the

room at the time

more than likely would never testify

even though some of them were retired

and were astonished

that the prosecutor and the judge in the

midst of a hearing

walked into chambers and came back out

to continue on

and approach the bench multiple times to

have a

conversation and then uh resume the

proceedings

exported communication all right export

today isn't a bad thing as long as

you're in the right jurisdiction you're

in equity the exclusive jurisdiction of

equity

using gibson's chapter 1 through 60

as reference points waypoints guide

points

and navigating those treacherous waters

of commercial law

carolyn knox did in fact partake in

export take communication

with the prosecutor brandon bernard

hansen on multiple occasions throughout

the legal proceeding karen lennox

seditious behavior and i chose to use

the word seditious

um because it was it was seditious in

nature and uh

you know it was it was something else um

behavior is notably incomprehensible

extremely unprofessional and was

witnessed by many throughout the

proceedings it's important to understand

that when i was going through this i was

drawing 30 40 50

60 people into a court that's how many

people

were leaving their jobs at one o'clock

in the afternoon to come watch the

show all right and it was powerful

because the people that cared enough to

be there whether they were there for the

shenanigans or whatever the george

carlin moments

were really there to find out what i was

pissed about

and it helped in prevailing any

reasonable man can understand what i'm

talking about right here

so from yelling from the bench failure

to answer questions practicing well from

the bench promoting the prosecution

brandon braun al-hansen's are uh yeah

prompting brandon bernal hanson to enter

motions

when he had said nothing not one word in

six months

you know the telepathic ability of

carolyn knox is amazing

uh it was just it was bewildering to me

the the

the alleged judge would sit on the bench

and prompt

the prosecutor didn't you want to file a

motion today

uh yes as a matter of fact i don't have

it quite written up yet

but i i do want to enter a verbal motion

are you me

i mean how much assistance are you going

to give this guy

in order to avoid my questions karen

lynn knocks failed to provide

i dirk's tongue gonzales with a trial by

jury as demanded karen lynn knox denied

i durst tom gonzalez

my sixth amendment and it's not a right

again another misnomer but we lean into

equity to comprehend the intent

which is to enforce the sixth amendment

to not allow egregious encroachment by

agents and agency upon my unalienable

rights

as per my demand before the courts for a

trial by jury verbally

all right karen lynn knows tonight i

derek's tongue is also the right to

counsel

now that's a substantial right violation

and

you need no uh conclusion or the case

doesn't have to be closed in order to

come in with an interlocutory appeal to

the appellate level about your

substantial rights violation

they got a cute little way about

skirting around

your right to counsel it's just real

cute you'll figure it out

karen lynn oaks full spy uh falsely

arrested i derek's tongan's loss why do

i say that contempt of court

in a child support hearing cannot be had

because now they're acting judicially

instead of administeringly

and they're it's the perversion of the

separation of powers

after i had challenged jurisdiction

without addressing the issue of

jurisdiction that lay before the court

karen lynn knox decided

denied i derek's tom gonzalez the right

to a speedy trial

carolyn knox had engaged in conversation

via the telephone with tim todson and

valley county resident about

ideoxton gonzalez it just so happens tim

thompson frequents my parents home

for conversations and cocktails this

conversation took place during the

months

of proceedings whereas karen lynn knox

was to remain non-biased this

information will undoubtedly

uh be substantiated through phone

records and first-hand knowledge by tim

thompson

now whether or not i get this guy this

joker to testify against his own family

probably not but here's the facts

them phone records are undeniable all

right

12. karen lynn oaks was demanded by i

derek's tom gonzalez

repetitively to recuse herself as to her

unprofessional conducts auditious

behavior export take communication

carolyn knox clearly violated canon set

forth

to ensure a proper and fair meaningful

hearing karen london oaks has a huge

conflict of interest

in the matter that cannot be overlooked

whereas karen lynn oaks is a bar member

is contracted under cfr

302.34 receives compensation from the

state treasury as does brandon braun al

hansen

who also is bar member paid by the state

treasury both

are gainfully employed not only by the

state of nebraska whereas they receive

their salaries and pensions both karen

lynn oaks and bronner brown al hansen

are in fact

contracted with uh title 42 usc

uh 654-3 under

cfr 302.34

the bar association has also contracted

to the title 4d support

usc title 42 654.3

let me remind you carolyn knowks as well

as brandon barnell hanson our bar

association

members contracted with all three

entities simultaneously where is

derrick's

gonzales right to a fair and meaningful

hearing again

karen lynn knox is in violation of the

separation of powers act

whereas carolyn knox is operating in the

executive branch as a ministerial

administrator for the benefit of

title 4d u.s title 42 usc

654.3 as a single and separate entity

person whereas karen lynn oaks

must adhere to her contract cfr 302.34

to enforce provisions and enrich the

nebraska state treasury

title 42 usc 666 falls under the social

security act

in the executive branch thus carolyn

knox is in clear violation of separation

of powers act

karen lynn knox no longer qualifies for

judicial eleventh

amendment immunity as in her violation

of the separation of powers act

she is now operating in her personal

capacity subject to liability and

damages she

may cause in her actions

adjudication without pr resentment of a

bill karen lynn knows how do you assess

this sentence without a bill all right

without a true bill doing owing

how do you substantiate jurisdiction how

are you able to render a sentence

without the thing of value being

before you in order to assess the

situation karen lynn knows how do you

decide a value assessment without having

the thing

that is valuable karen lynn knows how do

you create a bill

contempt charge for this sentence karen

lynn oaks are you

waiting for me to accept your bill that

you probably have not written before you

negotiate it

because remember she's a banker sitting

on a bench all right it's all in black

salt dictionary explains to you exactly

what they are after 1933

they're bankers period handling

financial instruments and negotiating

them

karen the nooks is the value of the

payment of this alleged debt

to be made with money karen lynn knows

what species are we talking about

currency karen lynn nooks by

currency do you mean i am to use the

bankers

uh banksters private property printed pr

paper pledges

of credit instead of my own already on

deposit to set off this

debt claim karen lynn knows what is the

value in the banksters paper currency

federal reserve notes fiat

of this sentence and furthermore if

you're going to tell me that i need to

use federal reserve notes

one i need to know what your private

interest in a private for-profit

corporation identified as a federal

reserve that's privately owned

is and why i have to use their

intellectual private copywritten

trademark

property to satisfy and indulge you

or your principal right what's your

interest in me using their

karen lynn knows what is the value of

warehousing sentencing

of one year of derek's body a month a

day

okay karen lynn knows are there

different sentence values coming from

different judges within this venue

pertaining to the same subject matter

right we want to know if if

if if all their judgments are the same

and unanimous across the board because

they're not ladies and gentlemen

if you piss them off by asking too many

questions your sentence is more severe

if you go along to get along you might

just do a few weeks in the pokey

you know while you abandon all your

rights titles and interests carolyn

knows are you sentence

are your sentencing values the same for

everyone

you are assessing so basically

on all the child support issues that you

handle are your assessments

the same on every last one of them as

far as how long your warehouse

my body while bonds mature and secure

securitize karen lynn oaks are you

sentence sensing values the same or

similar to other judges assessments

karen lynn knocks

does the warehouse sheriff sheriff's

facility which is the warehouse for the

body

get paid for keeping my person while

enforcing your sentence

very important questions nobody answered

them ladies and gentlemen

does that make me crazy well i don't

know that's for you to decide

carolyn knocks does any part of this

debt claimed get paid

from whatever source is paying to

warehouse my person in the sheriff's

facility

i derek stone gonzales have not been

presented or shown a claim

or bill showing idea gonzales owe a debt

to anyone in valley county district

court ci 1658

i derek's tom gonzalez have never seen

nor laid eyes on a

bill a true bill to annoying therefore i

have no idea what

value is being claimed or bill to my

property

build to my property my estate right

and i'm going to leave you with this

because my throat's getting sore we're

on page 11.

i'll come back we'll do round two on

this or maybe

uh we'll just put it in self governance

u.com

and participating members can enjoy the

rest of the story

like paul harvey i don't know this is so

important guys what i'm sharing with you

none of this is rebotted nobody's got an

answer

all right so classes are coming up this

is the kind of intense detail we get

into i mean

next is the conflict interest i i can't

stop at this point conflict

interest corpus juris kingdom volume 7

subsection 4

attorneys and clients man

these lion looting pandering pieces of

fecal matter

it breaks my heart because they're our

brothers and sisters right and they're

operating under titles doing

heinous things harming other men and

women good men and women just trying

to make a living right and they unjustly

enrich themselves through their

artifices and schemes and we got to lead

them back

back home we got to lead them back to

god we got to lead them back to the word

and get them back to being honest we're

not supposed to be hanging and lynching

and burning these people we should be

helping them

they got an addiction to corruption and

it's systemic

and it's a problem the real pandemic is

the

the corruption pandemic ladies and

gentlemen and

let me tell you it's not because lawyers

don't know any better

they spent seven years mastering how to

manipulate language

cast spells and put curses on you and

they know what they're doing corpus

juris academy volume 7 section 4

attorneys and clients the attorney's

first duty is to the court

and the public public not being what you

believe it to be believe is the lack of

knowledge public is the public trust for

which they're administering

on behalf of their principle that

justifies their juxtaposition of having

a career

okay and fleece fleecing and extorting

the american people and furthermore

the people around the world not to the

client

all right and whenever the duties to his

client conflict with those he owes

as an officer a title

of the court in the administration of

justice

which really stands for just us okay

the former must yield to the latter what

does that mean what did i just convey to

you ladies and gentlemen

corpus just kind of volume seven

subsection four tells you

that anytime there's any controversy

between his client

and his first obligation the courts

the client gets the shaft and his

allegiance and alliance

lays with the court you cannot hire a

bar member

to handle your affairs ladies and

gentlemen can't do it

so how do we correct it we have to

become learned

and with that i'll see you guys at self

governance you dot com

look forward to seeing you guys i'll

come back on later and give you a little

more of this

it's 27 pages long and i'm telling you

it was never rebutted by a soul all

right

thanks again for joining me

Other suggestions:

How I Beat Child Support Part 1 of 2 (Free Training)

#childsupport #pro-men I beat the Child Support and I want to help you too

7 things not to do while going through a child support case

How to Get Rid of Childsupport

How To Terminate Child Support Order | Getting Judge To Sign FL-195 For Employer

3 ways to avoid paying child support. LEGALLY

Five Mistakes that People Make In Child Custody Cases

Which Laws You Can Use To Defeat Child Support - Constitution or State Statutes & Codes

Deadbeat dad speaks from prison about unpaid child support

How to Prove a Parent is Unfit in a Child Custody Case

How to beat A Child Support Case

How I Beat Child Support Part 1 of 2 (Free Training)

Sharing buttons:

Other suggestions: